Which scenario is an example of a jurisdictional exception in an appraisal assignment?

The scenario involving the probate court paying appraisers based on the value of the subject property serves as a clear example of a jurisdictional exception in an appraisal assignment. A jurisdictional exception arises when the regulations or laws that govern an appraisal assignment impose specific requirements that diverge from the usual appraisal standards. In this case, the probate court likely has its own directives that affect how appraisers determine their fees based on the property's assessed value instead of following the typical fee structures established by prevailing standards in the appraisal profession. This reflects how legal or regulatory frameworks can necessitate deviations from standard appraisal practices, making it a quintessential example of a jurisdictional exception.

In contrast, the other scenarios typically do not fall under jurisdictional exceptions. Specific data requests by a lender represent standard client-driven requirements that can vary but don't constitute a systemic alteration in appraisal guidelines. Similarly, the date of report submission represents a logistical or administrative aspect of an assignment rather than a deviation from established standards. Lastly, a client requesting a rushed appraisal reflects a demand for expedited service and may influence an appraiser's approach but does not imply a legal or regulatory deviation affecting fundamental appraisal processes. Thus, the probate court scenario is the clear instance of a jurisdictional exception.