If a client's objectives lead to biased assignment results, who is responsible?

In this scenario, the appraiser holds the responsibility for any biased assignment results that emerge due to the client's objectives. Although clients may express their expectations or desires regarding valuations, it is the appraiser's professional duty to maintain objectivity and adhere to ethical standards established by regulations and associations, such as the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP).

An appraiser's integrity and independence are paramount in ensuring that the appraisal reflects the true market value of the property, rather than being influenced by the client's preferences or pressures. The ethical guidelines dictate that if a conflict arises between a client's objectives and accurate valuation practices, the appraiser must prioritize unbiased analysis and clear reporting, ensuring that the results are credible and reliable.

This responsibility also aligns with the expectation that appraisers uphold their professional judgment and expertise, providing valuations based on factual data and verified methodologies rather than subjective input from clients. Therefore, even if the client pushes for a particular outcome, it is ultimately the appraiser's responsibility to uphold the quality and integrity of their work.